Kedudukan Hukum Rupiah Digital sebagai Alat Pembayaran yang Sah: Analisis Yuridis atas Kesiapan Regulasi Bank Indonesia dan Dampaknya terhadap Sistem Perbankan Konvensional

Authors

  • Felicia Shinta Romauli Tambunan Universitas Padjadjaran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71417/jchi.v2i1.199

Keywords:

Environmental Protection, Free Trade, GATT Article XX, Liberalization, WTO

Abstract

Globalization drives economic liberalization through WTO frameworks, creating tensions between free trade efficiency and environmental protection. This study aims to analyze WTO regulations' sustainability basis, particularly through Marrakesh Agreement 1994 and GATT Article XX. Employing normative juridical methods, the population comprises WTO documents since 1994, with purposive sampling of key cases DS58 (US-Shrimp) and DS381 (US-Tuna II Mexico). Secondary data from treaties and dispute reports were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Findings reveal WTO's normative commitment to sustainable development via CTE committee and TBT/SPS regulations, yet implementation faces conflicts due to differing interests between developed and developing nations, as evidenced by discriminatory eco-labeling disputes. In conclusion, while Article XX enables environmental exceptions if non-discriminatory, stronger harmonization mechanisms are needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483391840

Emzir. (2022). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Prenada Media Group. https://doi.org/10.31289/jhp.v7i2.12345

Fauzi, A. F. (2023). Peran World Trade Organization (WTO) dalam perlindungan di era liberalisasi perdagangan. Jurnal Crepido, 5, 45-60.

Gehring, M. W., & Segger, M. C. C. (2005). Sustainable development in world trade law. Kluwer Law International.

Guzman, A. T. (2008). How international law works: A rational choice theory. Oxford University Press.

Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009). The political economy of the world trading system: The WTO and beyond (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Irwin, D. A. (2015). Free trade under fire (4th ed.). Princeton University Press.

Ismelina, M., & Rahayu, F. (n.d.). Isu penegakan hukum lingkungan dalam kerangka perdagangan bebas di era globalisasi. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan.

Muslimah, S., & Latifah, E. (2022). Perdagangan internasional dan perlindungan lingkungan hidup: Sebuah 'trade-off' pada sistem WTO yang memerlukan penyelesaian. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i2.689

Sende, K. (2023). International trade law and sustainability: Balancing trade liberalisation and environmental protection. Robert Gordon University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14534.24643

Spence, M. (2011, March 15). Trade liberalization and environmental protection. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2011/03/15/trade-liberalization-and-environmental-protection/

Stoessel, M. (2001). Trade liberalization and climate change. The Graduate Institute of International Studies.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.

Sudaryono. (2024). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif untuk ilmu hukum. Genta Publishing. https://doi.org/10.47134/penerbitan.v1i2.567

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wijaya, E., Nopiandri, K., & Habiburrokhman. (2017). Dinamika upaya melakukan sinergi antara hukum perdagangan internasional dan hukum lingkungan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(3), 488–508. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017

World Trade Organization. (1994). Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto_e.htm

World Trade Organization. (1994). Ministerial Decision on Trade and Environment (Doc. MTN.TNC/MIN(94)/1). https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UR/TNCMIN94/1.PDF

World Trade Organization. (1947). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947, Article XX (b) and (g). https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_01_e.htm

World Trade Organization. (n.d.). United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (DS58). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm

World Trade Organization. (n.d.). United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products (DS381). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds381_e.htm

United Nations Environment Programme. (2005). The trade and environment effects of ecolabels: Assessment and response. UNEP.

World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). https://www.learning.wto.org/pluginfile.php/118/mod_data/content/1908/8DD1F7FF-27CF-49C5-9C9D-7C4DB94BA36A.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-04-12

How to Cite

Kedudukan Hukum Rupiah Digital sebagai Alat Pembayaran yang Sah: Analisis Yuridis atas Kesiapan Regulasi Bank Indonesia dan Dampaknya terhadap Sistem Perbankan Konvensional. (2026). Jurnal Cendekia Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 951-956. https://doi.org/10.71417/jchi.v2i1.199

Similar Articles

11-17 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.