Konstruksi Kepercayaan Politik Generasi Z di Tengah Disinformasi Politik Pasca Pemilu 2024 (Studi pada Mahasiswa International Women University)

Wanda Fitria; Umi Narimawati

doi:10.71417/jchi.v2i2.245

Authors

Wanda Fitria Universitas Wanita International Author
Umi Narimawati Universitas Wanita International Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71417/jchi.v2i2.245

Keywords:

Generasi Z, Kepercayaan Politik, Disinformasi

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konstruksi kepercayaan politik generasi Z di tengah disinformasi politik pasca Pemilu 2024, dampaknya terhadap partisipasi politik, serta kontribusinya terhadap visi entrepreneur generasi Z. penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan Teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan dokumentasi. Informan penelitian terdiri dari mahasiswa International Women University dan dosen sebagai informan pendukung yang dipilih secara purposive. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepercayaan politik generasi Z terbentuk emlalui proses penerimaan, pemaknaan, penyaringan, dan evaluasi terhadap informasi politik, terutama yang diperoleh melalui media sosial. Disinformasi dapat menimbulkan keraguan dan skeptisisme terhadap pemerintah, tetapi juga mendorong sebagian mahasiswa menjadi lebih kritis dan selektif dalam menerima informasi. Kondisi tersebut turut memengaruhi partisipasi politik, baik dalam mendorong keterlibatan yang kritis mapun menimbulkan kecenderungan apatis. Selain itu, kemampuan memverifikasi informasi dan mengambil keputusan berdasarkan fakta memiliki relevansi dengan pembentukan karakter entrepreneur. Dengan demikian, kepercayaan politik generasi Z pasca pemilu 2024 cenderung bersifat kritis, selektif, dan evaluative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(4), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344221116620

Ahmad, S., & Wilkins, S. (2025). [Artikel sesuai sumber yang digunakan dalam naskah]. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2021). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 44, 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Buschle, C., Reiter, H., & Bethmann, A. (2022). The qualitative pretest interview for questionnaire development: Outline of programme and practice. Quality & Quantity, 56, 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01156-0

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Devine, D. (2024). Does political trust matter? A meta-analysis on the consequences of trust. Political Behavior, 46(4), 2241–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09916-y

Devine, D., & Valgarðsson, V. O. (2024). Stability and change in political trust: Evidence and implications from six panel studies. European Journal of Political Research, 63(2), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12606

Fernández Muñoz, C., Rubio Moraga, Á. L., & Álvarez Rivas, D. (2024). Generation Z vs. misinformation: Perceptions and practices in the digital age. Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 30(3), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.5209/emp.96511

Gvozdanović, A., & Stanojević, D. (2026). The origins of the youth’s political trust in Southeastern Europe. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 26(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2024.2378546

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Hunter, L. Y. (2023). Social media, disinformation, and democracy: How different types of social media usage affect democracy cross-nationally. Democratization, 30(6), 1040–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2208355

Jamie, K., & Rathbone, A. P. (2022). Using theory and reflexivity to preserve methodological rigour of data collection in qualitative research. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 3(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843211061302

Mari, S., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Suerdem, A., Hanke, K., Brown, G., Vilar, R., Boer, D., & Bilewicz, M. (2022). Conspiracy theories and institutional trust: Examining the role of uncertainty avoidance and active social media use. Political Psychology, 43(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12754

Mont'Alverne, C., Ross Arguedas, A., Banerjee, S., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). The electoral misinformation nexus: How news consumption, platform use, and trust in news influence belief in electoral misinformation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(S1), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae019

Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 44(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

Stachofsky, J., Schaupp, L. C., & Crossler, R. E. (2023). Measuring the effect of political alignment, platforms, and fake news consumption on voter concern for election processes. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101810

Su, Y., & Xiao, X. (2022). Interacting effects of political social media use, political discussion and political trust on civic engagement: Extending the differential gains model. International Communication Gazette, 84(3), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048521993118

Subekti, D., Yusuf, M., Saadah, M., & Wahid, M. (2025). Social media and disinformation for candidates: The evidence in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1625535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1625535

Susilo, M. E., Pawito, Purwasito, A., & Rahmanto, A. N. (2024). TikTok's influence on Indonesia's 2024 election: From general to “gemoy.” Asian Politics & Policy, 16(4), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12764

van Zoonen, W., Luoma-aho, V., & Lievonen, M. (2024). Trust but verify? Examining the role of trust in institutions in the spread of unverified information on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107992

Vuković, S., & Carpentier, N. (2023). The vertical and horizontal dimensions in the social construction of leadership: A case study on the social media followers of the Croatian politicians Zoran Milanović and Miro Bulj. Leadership, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150231202557

Yadav, [inisial penulis]. (2022). [Artikel sesuai sumber yang digunakan dalam naskah]. [Nama jurnal]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Zhang, Y., Tian, Z., Zhou, Z., Huang, J., & Zhu, A. Y. F. (2023). Intention to consume news via personal social media network and political trust among young people: The evidence from Hong Kong. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1065059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1065059